| ファイル情報(添付) | |
| タイトル |
PRO as Nominative Anaphor
|
| 著者 | |
| 収録物名 |
English Linguistics
|
| 巻 | 20 |
| 号 | 1 |
| 開始ページ | 143 |
| 終了ページ | 168 |
| 収録物識別子 |
ISSN 09183701
|
| 内容記述 |
その他
In this paper I claim that PRO and anaphors arethe same lexical item (ANPHR), and that their different phonetic forms are due to their different Case values. Namely, nominative ANPHR is realized as PRO, and ANPHR with any other Case is realized as "-self". ANPHR is licensed by phi-Agree, which takes the place of control and binding. Locality of control/binding results from the minimality constraint on Agree. When ANPHR fails to undergo Agree, it leads to pronominal PRO or "exempt" anaphor, whose reference is determined by pragmatic rules.
|
| 主題 |
PRO
anaphor
Case
phi-Agree
|
| 言語 |
英語
|
| 資源タイプ | 学術雑誌論文 |
| 出版者 |
日本英語学会
The English Linguistic Society of Japan
|
| 発行日 | 2003 |
| 権利情報 |
c2003 by the English Linguistic Society of Japan
本文データは日本英語学会より転載許可を得て掲載しています
|
| 出版タイプ | Version of Record（出版社版。早期公開を含む） |
| アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
| 関連情報 |
[DOI] 10.9793/elsj1984.20.143
|
