| File | |
| Title |
PRO as Nominative Anaphor
|
| Creator | |
| Source Title |
English Linguistics
|
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Start Page | 143 |
| End Page | 168 |
| Journal Identifire |
ISSN 09183701
|
| Descriptions |
In this paper I claim that PRO and anaphors arethe same lexical item (ANPHR), and that their different phonetic forms are due to their different Case values. Namely, nominative ANPHR is realized as PRO, and ANPHR with any other Case is realized as "-self". ANPHR is licensed by phi-Agree, which takes the place of control and binding. Locality of control/binding results from the minimality constraint on Agree. When ANPHR fails to undergo Agree, it leads to pronominal PRO or "exempt" anaphor, whose reference is determined by pragmatic rules.
|
| Subjects | |
| Language |
eng
|
| Resource Type | journal article |
| Publisher |
日本英語学会
The English Linguistic Society of Japan
|
| Date of Issued | 2003 |
| Rights |
c2003 by the English Linguistic Society of Japan
本文データは日本英語学会より転載許可を得て掲載しています
|
| Publish Type | Version of Record |
| Access Rights | open access |
| Relation |
[DOI] 10.9793/elsj1984.20.143
|
