File | |
Title |
SYMLOGの評定項目に関する妥当性の検討
|
Title |
Construct validity of the SYMLOG ratingform : A confirmatory factor analysis approach
|
Title Transcription |
SYMLOG ノ ヒョウテイ コウモク ニカンスル ダトウセイ ノ ケントウ
|
Creator | |
Source Title |
社会文化論集 : 島根大学法文学部紀要社会文化学科編
|
Volume | 7 |
Start Page | 133 |
End Page | 143 |
Journal Identifire |
ISSN 18802184
|
Descriptions |
The purpose of this study was to test the construct validity of the SYMLOG ratingform by using confirmatory factor analysis. The ratings were originally developed by Bales (1969), and consist of 26 Likert-type items arranged on a five-ordered response set ranging from “never” to “always.” In the SYMLOG system, the three-dimentional space is designed to assess the characteristic behaviors of any group of individuals in interaction with each other. The spatial names of the dimensions are U-D (for Upward-Downward), F-B (for Forward-Backward), and P-N (for Positive-Negative).
While the prior reseach has recommended to use the simple (non-combinative) ratingitems for the Japanese because of the cultural difference, few research studies have sought to explore the fruits of the multi-level observation usingthe combination of the adjective ratingitems based on those dimensions. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that fit indices for the three-factor model (hypotheseized the three-dimentional space) were statistically superior when compared with the one-factor model and the two-factor model even if the combinative items were used. The findings indicate that the combinative adjective items in the SYMLOG ratings could be working for research in the Japanese setting. |
Subjects |
SYMLOG
小集団構造
測定
尺度
妥当性
検証的因子分析
|
Language |
jpn
|
Resource Type | departmental bulletin paper |
Publisher |
島根大学法文学部
Faculty of Law and Literature, Shimane University
|
Date of Issued | 2011-03-19 |
Publish Type | Version of Record |
Access Rights | open access |
Relation |
[NCID] AA12006101
|
Remark | 1-4+ / 2004-2007 |