language |
eng
|
Author |
Sun Ming
Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China / Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
Wang Youxin
Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Sundquist Jan
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden / Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States / Department of Functional Pathology, Center for Community-based Healthcare Research and Education (CoHRE), School of Medicine, Shimane University, Matsue, Japan
Sundquist Kristina
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden / Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States / Department of Functional Pathology, Center for Community-based Healthcare Research and Education (CoHRE), School of Medicine, Shimane University, Matsue, Japan
Ji Jianguang
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
|
Subject | cancer; dementia; inverse association; incidence; nationwide
|
Journal Title |
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
|
Volume | 10
|
ISSN | 2234-943X
|
Published Date | 2020-02-4
|
DOI | |
PubMed ID | |
Publisher | FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
|
NII Type |
Journal Article
|
OAI-PMH Set |
Faculty of Medicine
|
Remark | This work was supported by grants awarded to JJ by the Swedish Research Council (2016-02373) and Cancerfonden (2017 CAN2017/340) and The Crafoord Foundation, to KS and to JS by the Swedish Research Council (2018-02400 and 2016-01176, respectively), to JS, KS, and JJ by ALF funding from Region Skane, to YWby National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (81673247 and 81872682). The funding agencies had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The researchers were independent of the funding agencies.
|