Construction of River Model Biofilm for Assessing Pesticide Effects

Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 60 Issue 1 Page 44-56 published_at 2011-01
アクセス数 : 1263
ダウンロード数 : 0

今月のアクセス数 : 14
今月のダウンロード数 : 0
File
archenvironcontamtoxicol60_44.pdf 584 KB エンバーゴ : 2017-06-21
Title
Construction of River Model Biofilm for Assessing Pesticide Effects
Creator
Jang Ji Eun
Yamamoto Hiroki
Source Title
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Volume 60
Issue 1
Start Page 44
End Page 56
Journal Identifire
ISSN 00904341
Descriptions
Due to the high importance of biofilms on river ecosystems, assessment of pesticides’ adverse effects is necessary but is impaired by high variability and poor reproducibility of both natural biofilms and those developed in the laboratory. We constructed a model biofilm to evaluate the effects of pesticides, consisting in cultured microbial strains, Pedobacter sp. 7-11, Aquaspirillum sp. T-5, Stenotrophomonas sp. 3-7, Achnanthes minutissima N71, Nitzschia palea N489, and/or Cyclotella meneghiniana N803. Microbial cell numbers, esterase activity, chlorophyll-a content, and the community structure of the model biofilm were examined and found to be useful as biological factors for evaluating the pesticide effects. The model biofilm was formed through the cooperative interaction of bacteria and diatoms, and a preliminary experiment using the herbicide atrazine, which inhibits diatom growth, indicated that the adverse effect on diatoms inhibited indirectly the bacterial growth and activity and, thus, the formation of the model biofilm. Toxicological tests using model biofilms could be useful for evaluating the pesticide effects and complementary to studies on actual river biofilms.
Language
eng
Resource Type journal article
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Date of Issued 2011-01
Rights
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010
Publish Type Accepted Manuscript
Access Rights restricted access
Relation
[DOI] 10.1007/s00244-010-9531-4
[NCID] AA00547363
isVersionOf [URI] http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00244-010-9531-4 isVersionOf