学習内容の構造(とくに,根拠を加えた)が学習効果に及ぼす影響について : 青少年の栄養の実験授業成績

島根大学教育学部紀要. 教育科学 Volume 8 Page 37-49 published_at 1974-12-25
アクセス数 : 1157
ダウンロード数 : 86

今月のアクセス数 : 0
今月のダウンロード数 : 0
File
b005000800k004.pdf 2.07 MB エンバーゴ : 2001-10-08
Title
学習内容の構造(とくに,根拠を加えた)が学習効果に及ぼす影響について : 青少年の栄養の実験授業成績
Title
On the Results Produced on the Effectiveness in Learning by the Structure of the Contents of the Lesson (Especially when the Ground-Explanation Is Added in the Lesson) : The Results of the Experimental Lessons in Youth's Nutrition
Title Transcription
ガクシュウ ナイヨウ ノ コウゾウ トクニ コンキョ オ クワエタ ガ ガクシュウ コウカ ニ オヨボス エイキョウ ニ ツイテ セイショウネン ノ エイヨウ ノ ジッケン ジュギョウ セイセキ
Creator
Morimasa Sadato
Watanabe Atsuko
Source Title
島根大学教育学部紀要. 教育科学
Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Shimane University. Educational science
Volume 8
Start Page 37
End Page 49
Journal Identifire
ISSN 0287251X
Descriptions
Purpose Our purpose was to inquire into the differences in the results produced on the effectiveness in learning by the structure of the contents of the lesson, with youth's nutrition, especially the decision of the required amount of nutrition, as the subject for our study. The experimental lessons were conducted in two groups ; one group used as the chief teaching material a textbook(T)which gave disconnected, insufficiently related explanations of the grounds for the decislon of the required amount of nutrition (Contrast Group), and the other group studied the lesson with the same textbook plus the well-arranged and better-related explanations of the grounds (G) for it (Experimental Group).
We also tried to make clear in what items of learning difficulty lay and why they were difficult in this lesson.
Method The four different types of experimental lessons were conducted as described below. They were all conducted at Junior High School attached to the Faculty of Education, Shimane University.
(OHP : an overhead projector ; bw : the blackboard writing ; oe : the oral explanations)
<tt>
Group Structure of the contents Learner
of the lesson

Contrast (a) T 21 girls of 1st Year, Class 1
┌(b) T + G (OHP) 21 girls of 1st Year, Class 2
Experimental|(c) T + G (bw) 20 girls of 1st Year, Class 3
└(d) T + G (oe) 21 girls of 1st Year, Class 4
</tt>
No significant differences were noticed among the four groups in the differential in intelligence.
Results(1) In answer to the teacher's question none of the students in the Contrast Group gave the necessary grounds for the decision of the required amount of protein, while in the Experimental Group quite a few gave satisfactory answers. (2) The understanding about calorie and the amino acid seemed to be difficult for the first year students of junior high school.
Language
jpn
Resource Type departmental bulletin paper
Publisher
島根大学教育学部
The Faculty of Education Shimane University
Date of Issued 1974-12-25
Access Rights open access
Relation
[NCID] AN0010792X