number of downloads : ?
File
language
eng
Author
Description
In this paper I claim that PRO and anaphors arethe same lexical item (ANPHR), and that their different phonetic forms are due to their different Case values. Namely, nominative ANPHR is realized as PRO, and ANPHR with any other Case is realized as "-self". ANPHR is licensed by phi-Agree, which takes the place of control and binding. Locality of control/binding results from the minimality constraint on Agree. When ANPHR fails to undergo Agree, it leads to pronominal PRO or "exempt" anaphor, whose reference is determined by pragmatic rules.
Subject
PRO
anaphor
Case
phi-Agree
Journal Title
English Linguistics
Volume
20
Issue
1
Start Page
143
End Page
168
ISSN
09183701
Published Date
2003
DOI
Publisher
日本英語学会
Publisher Aalternative
The English Linguistic Society of Japan
DCMI
text
NII Type
Journal Article
Format
PDF
Rights
c2003 by the English Linguistic Society of Japan
本文データは日本英語学会より転載許可を得て掲載しています
Text Version
出版社版
OAI-PMH Set
Faculty of Law and Literature
このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加