download : ? times
File
language
jpn
Title Transcription
ハンテイ キジュン カラ ナニ ガ ミチビキ ダセル ノカ : キェルケゴール アズラー ニ ツイテ ノ ショ オ メグッテ
Title Alternative (English)
What is Drawn Out from the 'Criteria'? : Concerninf Kierkegaard's the Book on Adler
Author
Description
In the manuscripts entitled The Book on Adler, Kierkegaard dealt with the case of Adolph Adler, a Danish pastor, who had claimed to have had a revelation. Doing so, Kierkegaard paid a lot of attention to the fact that Adler's claims as a whole lacked internal consistency demanded of them. I will, in this paper, make clear what conclusions Kierkegaard was able to draw out from this fact, which is often regarded as one of the most conclusive "criteria" he used to determine whether someone's claims of revelation are justified or not. In chapter 3 of these manuscripts, Kierkegaard required that the claims concerning religious authority and revelation should be internally consistent, because they should be claimed in accordance with the Christian "category", the specially religious from of life. But from the fact that Adler's claims as a whole lacked such consistency, Kierkegaard was only able to arrive at the conclusion that we have no reason enough to think that Adler had a revelation nor to think that he didn't. If no other premise is added, then we have to suspend judgment with regard to Adler's claims. After saying so, in chapter 4, Kierkegaard showed an explanatory hypothesis that when a Hegelian has an individually subjective religious experience, he tends to call it (away from the Christian use of words) a "revelation". Not until the accepted this hypothesis could Kierkegaard arrive, by applying the "criteria", at the conclusion that Adler didn't have a revelation.
Journal Title
新キェルケゴール研究
Volume
3
Start Page
57
End Page
81
Published Date
2004-07-11
NCID
AA11991718
Publisher
キェルケゴール協会
NII Type
Journal Article
Format
PDF
Rights
キェルケゴール協会
Text Version
出版社版
Gyoseki ID
e3820
OAI-PMH Set
Faculty of Law and Literature
このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加